How come Republicans criticized for suggesting that we raise the age for Social Security, but Democrats do not?
admin | Dec 25, 2011 | Comments 4
question by the judge by my terms, not my actions:) ? How come Republicans criticized for suggesting that we raise the age for Social Security, but Democrats do not
It’s really pun how the Democrats are now recognizing what everyone knew all the time taxes are increasing rapidly. Well in detail the president has promised not to raise taxes on 95% of Americans, they are simply going to “let the tariff cuts expire,” not “raise taxes” (LOL. …. .. do not like the semantics..) The really fascinating thing for me is the thought of Hoyer to reduce expenditures by increasing the age at which people are eligible for Social Security and Medicare. Is not this exactly what Republicans have been saying for a while? Not that I reckon it will be a magic solution (it will not) but are not Democrats are beginning to look a bit like the last batch of Republicans who voted just got in exchange for “change”? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_hoyer_taxes # mwpphu-conteneursMaison Republican leader John Boehner said: “The majority leader is incorrect about the future of this country, and what we must do now to ensure that the American dream is alive and well for our children and grandchildren. “On the expenditure side, Hoyer said Congress should consider raising the retirement age for full Social Security benefits and Medicare and make these incremental benefits to the wealthiest recipients hear less than the 2009 budget nécessiteux.Ce that helps leadership referred us to the supply of vague plans to “small adjustments in benefits for higher income beneficiaries if the Social Security Administration determines Trust Fund program can not meet its obligations”, but not starting up in 2036.L Last year it was released in April when the Democrats adopted Obama’s budget. Ryan (R-WI) says its current plot “rescues and strengthens Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security for their -. to fulfill their missions and make them permanently solvent “Translation – Social Security benefits will be cut-rate for age 55 and retirement age will augmenté.Les States budget,” All other workers will have a choice remain in the existing system or initiation contributing to personal accounts. Those who choose the personal account will be able to initiation investing a significant part of their payroll taxes into a series of funds managed by the U.S. government. “Preeminent answer :
Answer by
Jackass is liberalism for you
know better? House your own answer in the comments!
Popularity: 2% [?]
Filed Under: Budgeting
I have an original thought! How to make rid of the SS collectively?!
because that’s how it works … if you are involved is considered “strong” on a touch … you can cut the bejesus out of it … but if you are considered low … you make stoned, even if you boost … Obama sent twice as many troops in Afghanistan as Bush was there … and it’s getting fucked like no tomorrow for not “giving enough support” … happens every time with the Democrats and the military …
If people could keep their Social Security and Medicare, they would have much more money than what the government promises. Too terrible they refuse to use calculators, and instead treat us all like the 2% who can not manage their life.The Democrats say things like “we can not trust our money to Wall Street” and so far they attacked our money again and again. The system is full of IOU, and it’s unlikely most of us will even see the money we place in. I rather to save my own. I am a adult. Each member of Congress has invested money on Wall Street.EDIT: Thumbs Down another liberal who does not know MONEY. TYPICAL.
because Democrats want to boost the retirement age to 69 (he is 67 now) and let the benefits continue to vivre.républicains want to go the retirement age to 75, and terminate any payment of benefits after 80 years. they feel it’s really “ridiculous” to pay for social security benefits to any person in their 90.c is based on Rick Santorum. (Please annotation the voters of Pennsylvania was punished for revealing the truth about Republican plans as a warning to other Republicans.)