Is THIS barry’s “Financial Responsbility Budget” in action?
admin | Oct 24, 2010 | Comments 3
Question by Jimmbbo: Is THIS barry’s “Financial Responsbility Budget” in action?
Do you retract when 0bama jammed the “New Era of Financial Responsibility” budget thru Congress? How’s THIS for “responsibility”?…
(Reuters) – The United States posted an $ 82.69 billion deficit in April, nearly four times the $ 20.91 billion shortfall registered in April 2009 and the largest on record for that month, the Treasury Department said on Wednesday. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64B53W20100512
Libs – save us the “blame Bush” mantra… this is 0bama’s budget deficit – LARGEST IN HISTORY.
Jammie – a man EARNS respect.. barry has done NOTHING to earn mine, and in detail is an empty suited narcissistic incompetent Marxist ACORN South Chicago community organizer thug whose plans for 0bamaland, USSA are DESTROYING this country…
dolphin… Bush tried THREE TIMES since 2001 to fix Fannie and Freddie – he was BLOCKED by Bawney Fwank and Chris “The Crook” Dodd.
Preeminent answer:
Answer by Jammie
I feel that whether or not you agree with him –
He does deserve the respect of being called President Obama.
I disagree with a lot of the things that President Bush did but I still call him that out of respect.
Know better? House your own answer in the comments!
Popularity: 1% [?]
Filed Under: Budgeting
Your grasp on reality is shaky at preeminent.
The deficit is a creation of republican policies and the recessions.
It has very small to do with Obama’s policies.
The Bush tariff cuts for the wealthy are the largest contributor to our deficit.
I know righties like to aver that our deficit was zero when Obama entered office, but it was 1.2 trillion dollars at that time.
You’ll have to wait until after tonight’s evening “NEWS” for the blind sheep to make some talking points from Brown, Matthews, Stewart, Olberman, ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC.
Bush is responsible for not regulating the mortgage and financial services and investment banking industries. He believes in really simple solutions — one answer to all problems. So for religion it’s Jesus. For business it’s Milton Friedman (Dr. No Regulations), and for foreign policy it’s the thought of diffusion democracy like it was a religion.
Bush, the Moron President, was in charge for 8 years.
When Obama came in — literally on inauguration Day Wall Street was collapsing.
The government is running deficits because it’s not taking in any money, because we are still in a huge deep long recession, because of the Wall Street and mortgage banking excesses, because of no parameter, because of Milton Friedman and Bush who likes simple answers.
I like to reckon with my gut — says Bush.
Well Bush had dumb guts.
Most of the places his guts took him turned out to be terrible for USA — Iraq, Afghanistan, the Fantastic Recession — one disaster after another, and we got there, not because of Obama but because of Bush and his dumb guts.
I supported Barry Goldwater, ran on the same ticket as Ronald Reagan, supported Nixon, liked Ike, so please don’t call be a liberal.
Obama is a deplorable man with deplorable intentions for USA, but so far he has not harmed USA any worse than Bush, and in detail he may have reversed some of the Bush stupidities.
Why does one side in politics have to be aptly?
Why can’t they all be terrible?
Obama has not harmed USA, because he’s done small that could harm USA. Obamacare is going to make Zero-Funded starting in about 7 months, so Obama will not be able to harm USA by that crazy scheme.
The main harm that Obama is doing aptly now is firing virtually all government contractors and bringing the work back into the various Federal agencies where he’s got more and more plum book jobs and patronage jobs to hand out to his ACORN and Go On and SEIU campaign workers. Envelop lickers are now holding SES jobs in Washington, telephone bank workers are holding Executive Level jobs.
The problem is that the agencies have no thought whatsover about how to really do the work they are taking back in. So they have to do it four or five times to make it aptly and it costs many times more money than the ancient contractors used to charge for the same tasks accomplished.
This is going to hit the 2011 budget, so Congress will have a chance to just Zero-Fund a lot of those patronage jobs. Those folks will have to go back to Southside Chicago. Now they have suits, just add a gold chain and a white feather, they’ll be fine.
Bottom line Jimmbo is that getting your facts aptly is the key to having a lofty bite. If you want to be a perilous dog, you gotta have the real truth as your sword.
Just troll-grinding fools none of the people any of the time anymore because there are too many trolls out there grinding out the made-up spin.
Fleeting Answer: Obama would (will) be terrible if he could. But so far he hasn’t had time to harm USA a lot. What he has done is either neutral, beneficial, or easily reversed. His potential to harm will be greatly cut-rate when his thoughts are all Zero-Funded by the new and better Congress/Council that will come to America’s rescue just in time. Bush was the one that got us into the Financial mess, and the deficit mess is just a sequella to the Fantastic Recession. We do need to make out of it soon, but blaming Obama is a fake and misleading answer.