Muslims should be fined $ 1500 a year to wear the veil? (Muslim veil)?
admin | Dec 29, 2010 | Comments 10
Spacedog Question : Muslims should be fined 00 each year to wear the veil? (Muslim veil)?
Women who wear the Islamic headscarf coatings must be fined 1,000 euros (1,461 dollars) per year, Dutch MP Geert Wilders told Parliament Wednesday. Wilders leader of the Liberal Party PVV-aptly Freedom Party made the remarks during a parliamentary argument on the government’s budget plans. “Anyone who wants to wear a headscarf, should initially apply for a license headscarf,” said Wilders said. He said the fine, he called a “rag head tariff,” intended to “discourage” people wear musulmans.Wilders also announced Thursday that would file a motion against the government following its refusal to meet the demand of the Freedom Party to calculate “total cost of mass immigration.” The PVV said he would soon launch its own investigation to calculate the combined costs of immigration MAKE GROUND party leader who is highly critical of Islam and migrants, urged Dutch voters to support the Freedom Party in providing information on migrating a new site Web: www.watkostdemassaimmigratie.nl.Wilders proposed to stop all immigration for the retirement of Dutch nationals would keep their monthly income in the years to state venir.les government’s budget plans, announced Tuesday, said some of the burden savings proposed in the wake of the economic crisis cuts would be achieved in caring for people âgées.Je do not know if there is much difference in RACISM. In Europe, you have several parts instead of two, which is better in my opinion, like I dislike both McCain and Obama, but you will often have a party that is more rascist than the other. This was in the Netherlands since 2001.Tout the world has the aptly to criticize everything. I do not agree. But I reckon section of democracy is the protection of minorities. Preeminent answer:
Response Stalvern John n
is petty religious discrimination.
know more? House your own response in the comments!
Popularity: 1% [?]
Filed Under: Budgeting
Unquestionably not. Such a law would be a violation of personal freedom.
Not in most circumstances. If for some reason (and I can not reckon of everything) there is a circumstance where wearing a headscarf is perilous for the general population that may be. But a Muslim woman should not be fined for wearing a headscarf or recovery.
no. it’s a terribly stupid thought. people should be able to practice their religion without being forced to pay for it.
If non-Muslims in Muslim countries to a fine of an amount equivalent to not wearing a veil?
then the same people making these ridiculous “laws” b! tch and moan about the so-called “jizya”, or the special tariff imposed on Muslims non-Muslims there are 1500 ans.Quelle irony!
I reckon it is stupid and evil, but in a Machiavellian perspective, people have the aptly to make whatever laws they want. If someone disagrees, he or she has the aptly to awaken the public to change or house.
Either allow it or not, they should not try to use religion to make money. Personally I reckon the veil should be banned, I mean, you never wear away with things like that in public, but when it is in the name of religion all of a sudden it’s satisfactory.
Geert Wilders has as much aptly to criticize Islam as Salman Rushdie.Il not be “for” immigration is.
It’s a tough question … a clash between religious convictions or beliefs, and the need for security in a day and age does not aid when racist terrorisme.Il involved … obscures the issue of security and makes him look like religious oppression in house.Et is really a safety issue … especially when it has been demonstrated in the past how simple it is to hide a bomb under all that loose clothing … not to mention allowing criminals, whose face may be on sought after posters or flashed on News, to hide from view to simply go to a Muslim, it might even be a man under clothing and no sait.Et a sovereign country has the aptly to enact laws with the majority support, especially when the safety of the majority is concerned. And each country is different … with different laws. An American who travels to Iran would realize that freedom of expression does not take on Iran and it would be stupid to reckon that America is a aptly that was in another country America. So far it seems that Muslims in Europe feel that their traditions and laws they are used to life by their forwards when they house their home country … they seem to reckon that nothing in their lives must change, apart from for the country they live ENJE reckon that when you choose to go to another country, a country where you know the laws are very different from your country of origin you can also choose to house behind the traditions and behaviors that may very well not be acceptable in the new pays.Il atheist would be like a walk in a Christian church for the initially time and requiring that all Bibles be removed because that the atheist is offended by them … Christians show the atheist porte.En the same way … is what is happening in Europe … a lot of Muslims are turning to non-Muslim country, and rather than adopt rules as the base country and the laws they try to change their pro-Muslim, or just simply ignore the laws .. . and Europeans are about to just show them the door.
I reckon it’s both excellent and terrible.