Q & A: If Bush was such a spendthrift, why reason given for the $ 410 billion omnibus bill that “Bush’s tight budget, too?

Question by Prince Barefoot : If Bush was such a spendthrift, why is the reason given for 0 billion Omnibus Bill that “Bush budget too tight ?
much? Is this “budget crunch” under Bush means that, unlike Bill Obama, it has not allocated (to name a few) $ 200,000 for “Violence Program of tattoo removal outreach prevention, “pg. 283; $ 1.8 million for the smell and investigate swine manure management in Iowa, 2 million to promote astronomy Hawaii381.000 dollars to music programs in New York City’s Lincoln Center.5, 8 million to affect the “Ted Kennedy Institute for the Council … for plotting and design of a building and an endowment, “pg. 232 * And the Inhabitant Council of La Raza, $ 473,000 of Sens. Bingaman and affect Menendez, pg. 212.Le bill is HR 1105 . Of this $ 410, the law prévoitprès 8 billion dollars for 8500 PROJECT OF CONGRESS PET also known as the affects, as taxpayers, based in Washington for Common Sense.http: / / www.bloomberg.com / apps / news? pid = 2 …* The distinctive marks mentioned are very small percentage of JUST TO GIVE EXAMPLES Preeminent answer:

Answer by my brain reason
Talk to the Libs is like trying to teach a dog to drive a car.


What do you reckon? Answer below!

Popularity: 1% [?]

Filed Under: Budgeting

Tags:

About the Author:

RSSComments (2)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. §§pecial Unicorn says:

    My thoughts on the Omnibus Bill is that it is a compilation of legislation remaining they could not do without. Before becoming a hot topic, Neal Cavuto interviewed a senator idiot who basically said he was “spending remains” and that Obama had questioned them CLEAR year of the last budget. I’m willing to bet if we cross reference, all the crap in the bill, we find that he did not have a leg to stand on when it was introduced, and therefore was rejected. … Now they simply through grooming on. I pay for removing tattoos and losers who have not had the excellent sense to know that it’s forever and is a bee-otch to make rid of .. .. no.

  2. My Facts are Supported by Theory says:

    Exploring pets had ear marks more than all you mentioned,

Leave a Reply

Bad Behavior has blocked 1521 access attempts in the last 7 days.